Learning, memory & adaptation
Exploring cognitive computation and the relationship between experience, prediction, and action. Interactive tasks offer a way to ask specific questions about an experimental system’s behavior.
I’m Sterling Tuttle. I’m interested in how systems learn, remember, and adapt—and how that work can help us build a more sustainable future.
Exploring cognitive computation and the relationship between experience, prediction, and action. Interactive tasks offer a way to ask specific questions about an experimental system’s behavior.
Duck simulations and adaptive-control experiments provide a tangible setting for studying movement, feedback, and failure. Simulation is a testing ground for questions about embodied systems.
Investigating signals, comparisons, and the conditions under which a prediction is useful. The challenge is to distinguish an interesting historical result from an advantage that survives new tests.
The work is experimental. I use interactive tasks, simulated environments, and historical prediction tests to examine specific questions. Published results will identify the version tested, comparisons, and limits of the evidence.
A public software project exploring how agents communicate and coordinate work. The repository is a place to inspect the implementation, follow its development, and ask concrete questions about its behavior.
A recent AI-assisted review checked TinyHive’s payload handling across four retrieval methods. Twelve fixture cases behaved consistently; an older raw-string expectation differed from the returned JSON envelopes. The report separates that component check from full-system testing and records what still needs a decision.
An AI-produced follow-up review on Prime Intellect’s Verifiers project checked a proposed prompt-rendering change and suggested a regression test for preserving literal placeholder text. Five isolated function-level checks passed. The public comment credits the original author and separates compatibility checks from repository-wide testing or model-defense effectiveness.
I guide research direction and experimental decisions; AI does most coding. The maintenance review above is newly performed AI-assisted work, not a claim that I personally wrote a historical repair. Project source and component checks establish specific evidence, not production reliability.
My background spans partner and affiliate systems, paid search, web development, and business operations. Alongside that work, I pursue independent research into learning, memory, and adaptive systems. I learn by building, testing, and staying with the questions.
I originate ideas and research directions, then lead AI teams through implementation and testing. AI does most of the coding. My role is to frame the experiments, challenge the results, and decide what to investigate next.
I’m working toward a research-lab role where I can collaborate with curious people on difficult problems. I’m also open to AI engineering and consulting that builds useful experience and moves that work forward.
Define the observation and the comparison before deciding what a result means.
Corrections and negative results help determine which direction deserves more work.
A sustainable society shaped by AI is the larger goal. Problems we face today are where the ideas must prove useful.
Working on something difficult? I’m interested in research opportunities, substantive technical conversations, and AI engineering projects where I can contribute and learn.
sterling@sterlingtuttle.com ↗